GET1026 Effective Reasoning

This module was recommended by a friend. And I will recommend it to people who like MCQs and open book exams. 

I would say that this was a pretty good recommendation from my friend. It was a relatively chill module. All the test are open book, which means you don't really have to study. The downside is that the bell curve is insanely steep and the questions are tricky, so I was preparing to S/U this module. 

It is a philosophy module (something I have always wanted to try). Teaches you how to identify the different components of an argument, the different types of arguments and fallacies. Making simple things complicated. But you do feel slightly smarter after the lecture hahah. It can be interesting at times, but most of the time is was quite dry and technical. 

The lectures were webcasted, but the LT is usually full. Why? Because the Prof gives quizzes (really pop). There are three throughout the semester. He gave one at the start of the semester and two around the end. (essentially making everyone turn up for most of the lectures)

Assessment:
Pop Quizzes (2 out of 3 counted, each 10%)
IVLE Quizzes (3, each 10%)
Tutorial (attendance and class participation, 10%)
Finals (40%)

Expected Grade: B (was hoping to do better but the bell curve was just too steep)
Actual Grade: B+ (quite happy about it)

Comments

  1. beatrice12 July 2020 at 23:50

    hello i was wondering if you have the notes for this mod? I am planning to take this mod as well!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Student12 March 2021 at 07:11

    HI,

    I’m planning to take GET1026 module and would love to have some additional resources (lecture, tutorial notes, past year papers, quizzes and assignments).

    Could you kindly share your materials (files/folder) with me? I’d really appreciate it, truly.

    If there’s anything I can do for you in return, please don’t hesitate to let me know.

    Thank you very much!

    My email is: unistuff.nus@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Student11 June 2021 at 05:40

      Hi

      I came across your review online and I saw that u took GET1026 previously.

      I’m currently planning on taking this module and would love to have some additional resources (lecture, tutorial notes, past year papers, quizzes and assignments, book).

      Could you kindly share your materials (files/folder) with me? I’d really appreciate it, truly.

      If there’s anything I can do for you in return, please don’t hesitate to let me know.

      Thank you very much!

      My email is: unistuff.nus@gmail.com

      Delete
  3. Student11 June 2021 at 05:39

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GES1031 Culture and Communication in Singapore

This is the module that I felt the most mehhh about. This module was not my first choice. I got outbidded for a module so I had no choice but to chose this module.  The lectures were pretty boring and repetitive. The good thing is the lectures are webcasted. Woots.  I will not recommend this module. The project takes soo much effort for only 25% of the grade. The tutorial component is responsible for 20% of the grades but we barely did anything other than discussing our project, so I am not sure how they grade us on that component. The midterms and finals were MCQs and short essays. It was relatively content heavy as they basically test on the different theories. To score, you need to memorize. Because I was not really interested in it (unlike my life science modules), I found it hard to study for the module. I guess it is subjective, so maybe, you might like the module.  They asked us to purchase the textbook. (which I did not really use) Overall, I did lea...
Read more

LSM1106 Molecular Cell Biology

The lectures are not webcasted. (SAD) This module started off pretty chill. The first lecturer (Dr Lim Yoon Pin) went through stuff you already know. (btw you don't need to memorize the amino acids since they will provide a table with the amino acids in the exams, waste my effort lol). But that is just the beginning. The second lecturer (A/P Deng Lih Wen) went through enzymes and the third lecturer (A/P Mok Yu-Keung, Henry) went through carbo proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids. Oh my... my brain felt so mindblown every single lecture. Trying to keep up with them was an impossible feat. To make things worse, there was no webcast, so I could not go back to replay the parts that I had missed.  The first CA was manageable since it tested mostly on the stuff of the first lecturer.  But the second CA. I don't even know what to say, it was a disaster. I made the mistake of overestimating myself and decided that I could study last minute. But I was sooooo wrong. The amount o...
Read more